Relationship of Professional Development Participation to Observed Changes in Teacher Practice and Student Outcomes
Authors: Harriet Lamm, Margaret Hobson, Lee Sloan

Contents
1. Context of the Work
Print Poster
« Back to Poster Hall
1. Context of the Work
Next »

The Alliance for the Improvement of Mathematics Skills - PreK-16 (AIMS) was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) in the fall of 2002 with the overarching goal to prepare all students for college-level math courses by the time they graduate from high school through vertical alignment, professional development, challenging curriculum, the use of information technology, and research on strategies and interventions.  The partnership consists of two institutions of higher education (IHE) and nine rural and suburban independent school districts (ISDs) in South Texas.  There are approximately 28,900 students in the nine districts which range from 27.8% to 97.9% Hispanic and from 33.5% to 91.7% economically disadvantaged status.  There were 1,028 teachers who attended AIMS professional development.  Over the five years of the project, 2,854 hours of professional development were offered covering math content, curriculum, using technology, and mentoring. 

Several studies have demonstrated a relationship between professional development and teacher practice (Desimone, Porter, Garet, Yoon, & Birman, 2002; Guskey, 1986; Loucks-Horsley & Matsumoto, 1999).  Furthermore, extensive work supports the impact of teacher practice on student achievement (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000; Donovan & Bransford, 2005; Minstrell & van Zee, 2000).

The AIMS-sponsored professional development was offered for PK-16 teachers, faculty, and administrative participation.  Professional development offerings of AIMS were based on Texas Teachers Empowered for Achievement in Mathematics and Science (TEXTEAMS), a comprehensive professional development program for math (and science) that was designed to assist educators in understanding and implementing the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) through TEKS-based assessments and other activities based on the TEKS (Texas Education Agency, 2001).  Participants attended workshops on the IHE campuses or at facilities within the school districts.  Some of the workshops during Years Four and Five were focused on specific district and/or campus needs.  During the summer of Year Five, workshops to train teachers to be become Trainers-of-Trainers were held for four of the TEXTEAMS modules.  These participating teachers are now able to train teachers within their home districts as well as other districts in the use of the modules for which they received training. 

At the beginning of the AIMS project, there were 796 individual teachers who taught one or more mathematics classes in the participating districts.  With teacher turnover, 1028 unduplicated mathematics teachers attended AIMS sponsored professional development.   Table 1 indicates the number of teacher participants each year.

Table 1:  Teacher Participants in AIMS Professional Development by Year

 

Year 1  2002-2003

Year 2  2003-2004

Year 3  2004-2005

Year 4
2005-2006

Year 5  2006-2007

 

# Attendees

# Attendees

# Attendees

# Attendees

# Attendees

Elementary

1

344

472

216

298

Middle School

18

48

65

46

19

High School

56

62

103

47

12

Alternative School

6

4

8

3

4

Total

81

458

648

312

333

Participants attended workshops on the IHE campuses or at facilities within the ISDs.  Some of the workshops during Years Four and Five were focused on specific district and/or campus needs. 

In negotiations with the NSF program officer during start-up, the benchmark of 30+ hours a year was set as demonstrating significant, sustained AIMS involvement for teachers in professional development activities.  The numbers of teachers meeting this benchmark of 30+ hours of professional development in a single school year are shown on Table 2.  This table does include duplicated participants; that is, a single teacher could have participated in 30+ hours of AIMS professional development in more than one year.

Table 2:  Number Teachers by Campus Level  with 30+ Hours by Campus Type by Year

Campus Type

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3 *

Year 4 *

Year 5 *

 

2002-2003

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

 

30 or more hrs

30 or more hrs

30 or more hrs

30 or more hrs

30 or more hrs

Elementary

1

180

154

65

43

Middle School

10

33

38

22

6

High School

16

24

43

8

3

Alternative

2

2

4

21

1

Total

29

239

239

116

53